Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Duty to Warn: Your Honor: I Am Guilty of This:

By Gary Kohl

Photo by Joshua McElwee

”I am guilty of loving my planet more than I fear your jail.” 
                       – Steve Jacobs
  
In the opinion of many, including myself, the most courageous, fearless and prophetic people in the world are those tens of thousands of conscientious members of Catholic Worker (CW) Movement communities that, since the 1930s, have been, and “are committed to nonviolent resistance to evil because they trust in the truth and practicality of the radical gospel of Jesus and his ethical teachings.

The prophetic publication of CW founders Dorothy Day and the radical French Catholic peasant-philosopher Peter Maurin, is The Catholic Worker, still sold for 1 penny per copy. It was first published on May Day, 1933, in the midst of the Great Depression. Since then, through fits and starts, 213 Catholic Worker communities currently persist, in various stages of viability, throughout the world.

The Catholic Worker mission

The following statement from http://www.catholicworker.org/ summarizes the mission of the CW Movement:

“The Catholic Worker Movement is grounded in a firm belief in the God-given dignity of every human person. Catholic Worker communities remain committed to nonviolence, voluntary poverty, prayer and hospitality for the homeless, exiled, hungry, and forsaken. Catholic Workers continue to protest injustice, war, racism, and violence of all forms.”

Perhaps its most important ministry, considering our nation’s continuously funded, unaffordable, destructive, criminal and morally bankrupting wars, is its regular nonviolent direct actions against the madness of militarism.

The latest large CW action against the madness of nuclear weapons occurred on May 2, 2011, at Kansas City’s new Honeywell hydrogen bomb-making facility at Kansas City, MO. Honeywell is the infamous Minnesota “not-so-nice” multinational corporation that grew up in Minneapolis and that manufactures (through its spun-off subsidiary Alliant Tech) many highly profitable weapons of mass destruction (as well as weapons of individual and small group destruction). Alliant Tech and Honeywell have been picketed weekly, for decades, by Veterans for Peace, Women Against Military Madness, Catholic Workers and many other peace groups to expose the two corporation’s participation in international war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Steve Jacobs, photo by Indymedia UK
On May 2, 2011, just outside of Kansas City, MO, 53 people of conscience (28 women and 25 men), most of them Catholic Workers, were arrested just after the murder/assassination of the unarmed Osama bin Laden, who, by the way, was not even wanted by the FBI for any part of the 9/11/01 controlled demolitions of the three World Trade Center buildings because the agency found insufficient evidence of guilt. The 53 who were in prison for their trespass charges were fully aware of bin Laden’s extra-judicial killing and the glee portrayed by the average American in the street.

One of those arrested was CW member Steve Jacobs, from Columbia, MO, a person of faith and conscience who objects to the killing, rape, pillage and torture that is an intimate part of all wars, especially “US-led” wars. Jacobs has written a statement admitting his guilt in the action. He planned to read it to the judge and jury at the trial of the 53 on July 19.

Here is Jacobs’ powerful statement. He titled it “Your Honor: I Am Guilty of This:”

”I am guilty of knowing the difference between what is legal and what is right. Jesus tells us that the law is meant to serve humanity; humanity is not made to serve the law. Laws are just when they serve humanity and not when they protect those who create a mortal threat to its existence. Trespass laws which protect the makers of weapons of mass destruction against non-violent resisters have no authority over my conscience and act of resistance.

”I am guilty of trespass like a firefighter or a policeman is guilty of trespass when entering onto property in order to prevent a greater crime from occurring. You may believe the danger of nuclear annihilation is not imminent or that building these weapons of mass destruction are legal but I believe that any weapon that indiscriminately kills hundreds of thousands of innocents along with those who are targeted are immoral and have no right to exist. Creating more weapons makes their use more imminent, so we have a duty to stop their production now.

”Catholic bishops tell us that these weapons are immoral because if used they will continue to kill the innocent year after year from the effects of nuclear fallout and contamination. I am guilty of believing them.

”I am guilty of believing that any city that wishes to operate facilities to manufacture weapons of mass destruction (WMD) should have to put the issue to a vote before the citizens and that those who are morally opposed to these weapons cannot be made to pay taxes which enable their production because it is a violation of their conscience.

”I am guilty of believing judges have a duty to protect society from criminal schemes that condemn farm land under "urban blight laws" so that WMD's can be produced there and that they (judges) also have a duty to protect citizens from war profiteers who socialize the construction of WMD's and privatize the profits.

”I am guilty of loving my planet more than I fear your jail.”

Re-Defining the Euphemistic Term, War

If there were only more Americans as courageous as these Catholic Workers, courageous enough to rise up and publicly object to that reality that is euphemistically called war. (The word euphemism is defined as: an inoffensive term substituted for one considered offensively explicit).

I have witnessed the tragic, often permanent consequences of violence suffered by many soldier- and civilian-victims of war through my 40 years of practicing medicine, and I feel strongly that war would be better defined non-euphemistically as: ”the state-planned, state-sponsored, demonization and indiscriminate mass slaughter (including the maiming, starving, sickening, raping, pillaging and homelessness-making) of humans, most of whom are typically unarmed, innocent women, babies, children and the elderly, by well-trained, usually unaware killing-soldiers who obediently follow their lethal orders from command and control centers far away from the battlefield whose hidden paymasters are war-profiteers in government, finance, the media and the weapons industries .”

I have written frequently about the gruesome neurological, mental and spiritual consequences of participation in war and in the training for war. I can also attest to the fact that there is a very high probability that posttraumatic stress disordered veterans are highly likely to be incurable (although they may possibly be partially treatable if monumental efforts are undertaken).


My experience agrees with the published medical literature. It tells me that the deformities that can come from any experience of horrendous violence, whether one is the victim, the perpetrator or the bystander, are likely to be permanent. My experience also tells me that, (surprise, surprise) combat-induced mental and physical ill health is 100% preventable.

The Catholic Worker Movement knows that too and is warning us all. We need to listen to them.

Steve Jacobs is a Colombia, MO, Catholic Worker community member. The nonviolent direct action that he was arrested at was at Honeywell’s new 1 Billion dollar hydrogen bomb manufacturing facility in Kansas City, MO.

For background information on this specific case, see John LaForge’s article about the action, entitled "Up Against the War Machine in Kansas City", at:

Gary Kohls is a retired physician from Duluth, Minnesota, and a founding member of Every Church A Peace Church. He writes about issues of religion, militarism, peace, justice and mental health.


Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Thirty Questions about Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Power

A photo of French Nuclear tests in the 1970s.

































1. What is nuclear fission?


ANSWER: A nuclear reaction in which a heavy nucleus, uranium for example, splits into two lighter nuclei.


2. What is nuclear fusion?

ANSWER: A nuclear reaction resulting in two nuclear being fused, resulting in a new molecule and the massive release of energy.


3. Which female physicist informed Otto Hahn that nuclear fission could be instigated by humans?

ANSWER:  Lisa Meitner, 1939


4. Where was the first human-initiated sustained chain reaction?

ANSWER:  University of Chicago, December 2, 1941.


5. Which scientist informed President Roosevelt that it would be possible to create a bomb which could destroy an entire city?

ANSWER:  Albert Einstein


6. When was the first atomic bomb detonated?

ANSWER:  July 16, 1945, the Trinity Test


7. The president of which leading U.S. university initially proposed that Japanese cities with military functions and “densely packed workers homes” should be the criteria for identifying the cities to be targeted by the first atomic bombs?

ANSWER: James Conant of Harvard University


8. In how many second was the city of Hiroshima destroyed?

ANSWER: Nine


9. Which famous scientist joined with Lord Bertrand Russell in 1955 to urge the complete abolition of nuclear weapons?

ANSWER:  Signing the Russell-Einstein Manifesto was among the last acts of Albert Einstein before his death.


10. What are the three pillars, one of them unfortunate, of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty?

ANSWER:  The nuclear powers agreed to good faith negotiations to completely eliminate their nuclear arsenals in exchange for the non-nuclear nations’ commitment never to develop or possess nuclear weapons and recognition of their inalienable right to develop and use nuclear power for peaceful purposes.


11. The witness survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki A-bombs are called Hibakush Answer:   Are there U.S. Hibakusha?

ANSWER:  Yes, victims of uranium mining and the production of nuclear weapons, victims of the fallout of U.S. nuclear tests, and "Atomic Vets", many of whom were deliberately exposed to radioactive fall out.


12. What happened at Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima?

ANSWER:  A disastrous melt down of nuclear power plant cores, resulting in the release of radioactive fallout.


13. How many nuclear power plants are there in the U.S., and what percentage of U.S. energy do they produce?

ANSWER:  104 plants. 19.6% of U.S. energy consumption


14. Which country has surpassed the U.S. in the production of solar technologies?

ANSWER: China

15. Which two nations recently reiterated their commitment to completely eliminate their nuclear power production?

ANSWER: Germany and Italy


16. Name the nuclear powers, declared and undeclared.

ANSWER: The U.S., Russia, China, France, Britain, India, Pakistan, Israel, North Korea


17. The average strategic nuclear warhead, roughly 5,000 of which are currently deployed by the nuclear powers, is how many times more powerful that the Hiroshima A-bomb?

ANSWER: Fourteen


18. Who was Sam Lovejoy?

ANSWER: . On 22 February 1974, Washington's Birthday, organic farmer Sam Lovejoy took a crowbar to the weather-monitoring tower which had been erected at the site of the propose Montague nuclear reactor. Lovejoy felled the tower and then took himself to the police, taking full responsibility for the action. He was tried on charges of malicious destruction and acquitted on a technicality.


19. The occupation by anti-nuclear activists of the Wyle power plant production site in which country inspired the occupation of the Seabrook site at which 1414 activists were arrested for their nonviolent resistance?

ANSWER: Germany


20. The Federation of American Scientists estimates that the U.S. has how many nuclear weapons deployed on alert and available in its stockpiles?

ANSWER:  8,500



21. The Federation of American Scientists estimates that there are how many nuclear weapons in the world

ANSWER:  20,500


22. During crises and conflicts, how many times has the United States prepared and/or threatened to initiate nuclear war in order to enforce its Middle East hegemony and its resulting privileged access to Middle East oil?

ANSWER:  Eleven. (1946 re: Iran, 1956 Suez Crisis, 1958 Lebanese Civil War & Iraq Revolution, 1967 October War, 1970 during Black September War, 1980 announcement of Carter Doctrine, 1990-91 First Gulf War, 1996 threat against Libya, 1998 Iraq, 2002 run up to invasion of Iraq, 2006-2011 “all options are on the table” threats by Bush & Obama against Iran.)


23. Which of the nuclear powers have prepared and/or threatened to initiate nuclear war during international crises and wars?

ANSWER:  All of them.


24. What did the people of Rongelap atoll in the Marshall Islands and the crew of the Japanese tuna fishing boat, Lucky Dragon No. 5, have in common?

ANSWER:  They were exposed to the fall out of the Bravo H-bomb test in 1954, whose explosive power was roughly 1,000 times that of the Hiroshima A-bomb. Many of islanders and fishermen soon succumbed to radiation disease and cancer. (The bikini swimsuit derives its name from the shocking power of this explosion.)


25. How many petition signatures urging nuclear weapons abolition were delivered to the United Nations on May 2, on the eve of the 2010 Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty Review Conference?

ANSWER:  More than 17 million


26. In 1980, in what state were the first referendum held urging a freeze in the nuclear arms race?

ANSWER: Massachusetts


27. The legislatures of which two states have adopted resolutions calling for the U.S. to engage in negotiations leading to the complete elimination of nuclear weapons?

ANSWER: Vermont and Massachusetts


28. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Doomsday clock tells us that it is how many minutes before midnight (i.e. how close we are to a nuclear doomsday)?

ANSWER:  6 minutes


29. What will you do next week to press for the elimination of nuclear power production?

ANSWER: _______________________


30. What will you do next week to press for the complete elimination of nuclear weapons?

ANSWER: _______________________



Prepared by Joseph Gerson at the American Friends Service Committee,  JGerson@afsc.org

Gerson is also the author of Empire and the Bomb: How the U.S. Uses Nuclear Weapons to Dominate the World

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Gaza flotillas have made a difference

by Adam Shapiro

Pressure exerted by the campaign has forced real changes, something the international community could not deliver through 'established channels'



As ships continue preparing to depart for Gaza from Greece and as the Greek government continues to serve as the Israeli ‘call centre’ for outsourcing the blockade of 1.6 million Palestinians in Gaza, the myth continues to perpetuate that ‘established channels’ should be used to reach Gaza. 

Governments remain comfortable and unchallenged in maintaining a position that the situation in Gaza is untenable, that the blockade must end and that the blockade is illegal on the one hand and that by pursuing these established channels these same governments serve only to reinforce and legitimise the blockade.

It seems only the Palestinian people in Gaza must seek their freedom through established humanitarian channels that rely on the whim of their oppressor and the occasional glance of attention from the international community.  Being born in Gaza is being born into a life sentence of living in a virtual cage, without fundamental human rights.

The flotilla effort, initiated by the Free Gaza Movement in 2008 when it sailed small fishing ships to Gaza and successfully reached the port of Gaza, is not about humanitarian aid. It is about Palestinian freedom and their rights to access the world as any other people.  

And despite the chorus of “the flotilla is not necessary”, reality on the ground shows that it non-violent direct action that has been the only effective power to make change in the lives of Palestinians. 

The pressure applied by the flotilla effort has led to three main changes — in terms of the policy of the siege applied by Israel to Gaza; in terms of the media coverage and public attention to the crime scene that is Gaza; and in terms of compelling governments and institutions to take a position on the blockade.
Israeli policy

After Freedom Flotilla I, Israel came under enormous pressure worldwide, both popular and official.  As a result, within a number of days, Israel went from defending its policy of limiting items and goods allowed into Gaza to a list of between 70 and 80 items, chosen randomly and without any justification, to completely reversing track and creating a list of only banned items and having to justify why each item was listed. 

While this is far from the success the flotilla was aiming for and certainly did not mean an end to the blockade, it was the first time in three years that any change was made.  Even after US Congressmen visited Gaza and complained about the lack of basic food items being permitted into Gaza, Israel barely paid attention.

In the media arena, and shaping public opinion, the flotilla put Gaza back in the spotlight, not just for a short 24-hour news cycle, but for over a month.  Journalists based in Israel/Palestine who had accepted the Israeli government’s decision to bar and limit their access to Gaza, were clamouring to get into Gaza and reported the reality on the ground. 

Mainstream journalists from the US, Canada and Europe quickly adopted the language of the flotilla, referring to Gaza as an ‘open-air prison’ and showing the reality of the impact of the blockade on all aspects of Palestinian society in Gaza.  Furthermore, the flotilla put activists on an even level with Israeli diplomats and spokespersons in news programmes, talk shows and on op-ed pages of newspapers.
Untenable situation

The pressure of the flotilla also caused government leaders, UN officials and international organisations to take firm positions for the first time regarding the illegality of and need to end the blockade.

British Prime Minister David Cameron, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, and presidents and prime ministers from around the world made statements against the blockade and even US President Barack Obama called the situation in Gaza ‘untenable’. 

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon (not yet campaigning for a second term) condemned the Israeli violence. The UN Security Council also condemned the violence by Israel, and even US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was forced to support the Council’s position. 

And, in a significant legal development, the International Committee of the Red Cross/Red Crescent (ICRC), issued a determination two weeks after the flotilla that Israel’s blockade of Gaza constituted collective punishment and therefore was illegal according to international law.

With this year’s flotilla, Israel has out-sourced the blockade to Greece, in an effort to stop it without having to incur the wrath of the international community. But even this year, the concrete results of the flotilla are evident. In an effort to address the growing attention, once again, to the situation in Gaza, in early June Israel permitted reconstruction material into Gaza for 1,200 homes and 18 schools for the first time since the blockade was enacted. 

A few days prior to that Israel increased the number of trucks of humanitarian aid permitted into Gaza, though that number remained below the number permitted prior to the enactment of the blockade and well below the daily needs of the population of Gaza. Again, due to flotilla pressure, real changes on the ground, something the international community could not deliver through ‘established channels’.

Freedom, however, cannot be delivered through ‘established channels’ and that is the core mission of the flotilla effort. The other major development over the last year that has directly impacted the lives of Palestinians in Gaza (though also insufficient) has been the opening of the Rafah crossing in a limited capacity. 

The opening of the crossing occurred only after the Egyptian people rose up and removed Hosni Mubarak and his regime. Their movement for freedom included solidarity with Palestinians and thus the pressure to open Rafah.  Egyptians did not seek freedom and reform through ‘established channels’, which were corrupted and useless. 

And the international community did not have the hubris to suggest that Egyptians (or Tunisians or Yemenis or Libyans or Syrians) accept some limited quantities of approved items of aid instead of fundamental freedom and human rights. 

Only Palestinian demands are discarded.  And it is only the flotilla efforts and other forms of non-violent direct action — from protests in the West Bank against the Wall to Boycott, Divestment and sanctions efforts in the West against Israeli Apartheid — that is making these demands heard, understood and able to generate real change.
Our message to the international community: join us in our quest for freedom, and join the tide of history. 

Photo: Next Left Notes
Adam Shapiro is an organiser with the Free Gaza Movement. He is also a documentary filmmaker and human rights defender. He is currently in Greece working on overturning the travel restrictions on the Flotilla.  








Source: